学术经纬

Lancet Haematol | 儿童费城染色体阳性急淋白血病迎来治疗新选择

撰文 | 李宁    责编 | 周叶斌
急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)是儿童中最常见的血液系统恶性肿瘤,其中5%的患儿存在费城染色体(Ph)。与其他ALL类型相比,费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ ALL)患儿预后更差,单纯化疗后的长期无事件生存(EFS)率仅为30%。虽然可以通过在接受化疗首次达到完全缓解(CR)后进行造血干细胞移植(HSCT)改善患者预后,但仅有不到一半的患儿存活。
美国儿童肿瘤协作组(COG)和欧洲Ph+ ALL协作组(EsPhALL)自2000年来的三项研究(AALL0031研究、EsPhALL 2004研究及EsPhALL 2010研究)显示,与单纯化疗相比,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)伊马替尼联合强化疗可以显著提高Ph+ ALL患儿的生存率,从而彻底改变了Ph+ ALL的治疗模式。尽管如此,伊马替尼用于Ph+ ALL的治疗仍存在较高的复发风险和治疗相关毒性,因此目前迫切需要优化治疗手段。
达沙替尼是一种第二代TKI,其体外活性是伊马替尼的325倍,中枢神经系统渗透能力较伊马替尼更强,且对多种伊马替尼耐药突变表现出活性。此前进行的COG AALL0622研究显示,在联合相同强化疗方案的基础上,达沙替尼与伊马替尼有效性相似,且安全性良好。

近日,Stephen P Hunger  和 Andrea Biondi 团队在 The Lancet Haematology 发表了题为 Dasatinib with intensive chemotherapy in de novo paediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (CA180-372/COG AALL1122): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial 的文章。该文章报告了COG和EsPhALL 首次联合开展的一项针对达沙替尼用于治疗Ph+ ALL患儿的研究——CA180-372/COG AALL1122研究的结果。该研究采用了此前EsPhALL 2004/2010研究中所用的强化疗方案,使用的主要化疗药物的累积剂量较AALL0622研究更低。研究结果显示,与伊马替尼联合强化疗相似,达沙替尼联合强化疗用于Ph+ ALL患儿治疗的有效性和安全性良好,为该药用于儿童Ph+ ALL患者治疗的适应症提供了证据支持。

Image

CA180-372/COG AALL1122研究是一项开放标签、多中心、单臂2期临床试验。研究于2012年3月至2014年5月间纳入了来自全球69所中心的109例1~18岁初诊儿童Ph+ ALL患者。患儿在接受诱导治疗后的第15天开始接受达沙替尼联合强化疗治疗,治疗时长共计2年。研究人员在预定时间点对患者的微小残留病(MRD)进行了测量,并根据测量结果将患者分为了高危组(n=19)和标准风险组(n=87)。高危组接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)治疗(由研究者酌情决定是否在allo-HSCT后给予患者为期12个月的达沙替尼治疗;4例患者由于未找到匹配的捐赠者而未接受allo-HSCT)。标准风险组接受达沙替尼联合强化疗治疗(图1)。中位随访时间为67.2个月。

Image

图1:患者分组及接受治疗情况
研究显示,在整体患者中,患者3年和5年EFS率分别为65.5%(95% CI 55.5–73.3)和54.6%(95% CI 44.5–63.6)(图2A),3年和5年总生存(OS)率分别为91.5%(95% CI 84.2–95.5)和81.7%(95% CI 72.8–87.9)(图2B)。

Image

Image

图2:整体患者(n=106)的(A)EFS和(B)OS
与前述几项研究结果对比显示,相较于单纯化疗,达沙替尼联合强化疗在3年EFS方面具有优效性(49.2% [90% CI 38.0–60.4] vs. 65.5% [57.7–73.7]; P=0.032)。相较于伊马替尼联合强化疗,达沙替尼联合相同的化疗方案在3年EFS方面具有非劣效性,但不具有优效性(59.1% [51.8 to 66.2] vs. 65.5% [90% CI 57.7–73.7]; P=0.27)。不过值得注意的是,与前述针对伊马替尼联合强化疗的EsPhALL 2010研究结果相似,这项研究中亦有不少患者(n=38,占总体36%)在治疗期间出现了复发。
安全性方面,有2例患者因过敏和HSCT后出现的持续骨髓抑制停用了达沙替尼,77例患者(73%)出现了达沙替尼用药暂停,其中21例患者降低了剂量。研究期间未发生达沙替尼治疗相关死亡。此外,在HSCT后继续接受达沙替尼治疗的患者中,未发生3或4级感染相关不良事件。
综上所述,该研究结果显示,达沙替尼联合强化疗用于治疗儿童Ph+ ALL患者的有效性和安全性良好,3年EFS率与既往研究中伊马替尼联合强化疗结果相似,为这部分患者的治疗提供了新的选择。并且,虽然该研究采用的化疗方案剂量较COG AALL0622 研究更低,但仍展示出相似的有效性,提示Ph+ ALL患儿接受TKI联合强化疗治疗时或可降低化疗剂量,从而降低治疗相关毒性。不过,无论是伊马替尼还是达沙替尼,接受TKI联合强化疗的患者仍然面临着较高的复发风险,因此仍需探索更有效的治疗方法。

撰文

Image

责编

Image

制作

排版 | Sheila   校对 | uu

延伸阅读

St. Jude儿童医院发表最全面儿童急淋白血病药物基因组学蓝图,为个性化精准治疗铺路

儿童及青少年T细胞急淋新增强化疗方案的2期临床结果!

*本文由深圳市拾玉儿童公益基金会“儿童肿瘤前沿”团队编译或约稿,文中图表均源引自文献原文。本文著作权归文章作者所有,欢迎个人转发分享,未经允许禁止转载,作者拥有所有法定权利,违者必究。如需转载,请留言或联系[email protected]。本文旨在分享儿童肿瘤科研前沿成果,不是治疗方案推荐。如需获得疾病治疗方案指导,请前往正规医院就诊。

▼滑动查看更多▼

原文摘要(Abstract)

Background: The outcome of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia significantly improved with the combination of imatinib and intensive chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of dasatinib, a second-generation ABL-class inhibitor, with intensive chemotherapy in children with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Methods: CA180-372/COG AALL1122 was a joint Children's Oncology Group (COG) and European intergroup study of post-induction treatment of Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL) open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Eligible patients (aged >1 year to <18 years) with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and performance status of at least 60% received EsPhALL chemotherapy plus dasatinib 60 mg/m2 orally once daily from day 15 of induction. Patients with minimal residual disease of at least 0·05% after induction 1B or who were positive for minimal residual disease after the three consolidation blocks were classified as high risk and allocated to receive haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission. The remaining patients were considered standard risk and received chemotherapy plus dasatinib for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the 3-year event-free survival of dasatinib plus chemotherapy compared with external historical controls. The trial was considered positive if one of the following conditions was met: superiority over chemotherapy alone in the AIEOP-BFM 2000 high-risk group; or non-inferiority (with a margin of -5%) or superiority to imatinib plus chemotherapy in the EsPhALL 2010 cohort. All participants who received at least one dose of dasatinib were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01460160, and recruitment is closed.

Findings: Between March 13, 2012, and May 27, 2014, 109 patients were enrolled at 69 sites (including 51 COG sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia, and 18 EsPhALL sites in Italy and the UK). Three patients were ineligible and did not receive dasatinib. 106 patients were treated and included in analyses (49 [46%] female and 57 [54%] male; 85 [80%] White, 13 [12%] Black or African American, five [5%] Asian, and three [3%] other races; 24 [23%] Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). All 106 treated patients reached complete remission; 87 (82%) were classified as standard risk and 19 (18%) met HSCT criteria and were classified as high risk, but only 15 (14%) received HSCT in first complete remission. The 3-year event-free survival of dasatinib plus chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone (65·5% [90% Clopper-Pearson CI 57·7 to 73·7] vs 49·2% [38·0 to 60·4]; p=0·032), and was non-inferior to imatinib plus chemotherapy (59·1% [51·8 to 66·2], 90% CI of the treatment difference: -3·3 to 17·2), but not superior to imatinib plus chemotherapy (65·5% vs 59·1%; p=0·27). The most frequent grade 3-5 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=93) and bacteraemia (n=21). Nine remission deaths occurred, which were due to infections (n=5), transplantation-related (n=2), due to cardiac arrest (n=1), or had an unknown cause (n=1). No dasatinib-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation: Dasatinib plus EsPhALL chemotherapy is safe and active in paediatric Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. 3-year event-free survival was similar to that of previous Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia trials despite the limited use of HSCT in first complete remission.

DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00088-1

👇点击此处,直达原文