“家属为救心梗患者，砸私家车车窗取AED”，车主回应
双语君约 4 分钟据新京报消息，近日，山东威海一名市民的家人突发心梗，在拨打120急救电话并按照指引寻找自动体外除颤器（AED）时，发现附近一辆私家车上贴有AED标识。
由于一时联系不上车主，该市民自行破窗取出车内AED用于急救。事后，“当事人取得车主理解”的消息冲上热搜。
A heartwarming story has drawn widespread attention in China after a man broke a stranger's car window to access an automated external defibrillator (AED) for a family member suffering cardiac arrest.
The incident occurred on March 10 in Weihai, Shandong province. A local resident, upon learning that a nearby vehicle was marked with an AED sign, tried to contact the owner when a family member went into cardiac arrest. Unable to reach him by phone, the resident made the urgent decision to break the window and retrieve the life-saving device.
涉事车辆车主李先生表示，车上的AED是他今年2月购置的，花费近3万元。
他说，当时自己正在看短视频，看到了“车上配AED被砸车窗救人一命”的新闻，便想到可以买一台AED放在车上，以备突发情况。他平时经常开车跨市谈生意，也常到商圈聚会，车辆流动性较大，且停车地点多在人流密集区域。
李先生回忆，事发当天（3月10日）下午，他和朋友聚会后回到酒店休息。晚上11点醒来时，发现手机有多个未接来电，以为是骚扰电话便没有在意。直到约一小时后，一名患者家属通过手机号添加他的微信，说明因家人突发心梗遂砸窗取走车内AED用于施救的情况。
The car owner, surnamed Li, told reporters he had been resting at a hotel after meeting friends earlier that day. At around 11 pm, he woke up and noticed several missed calls but assumed they were spam. About an hour later, the resident, whose family member had gone into cardiac arrest, contacted Li via WeChat and explained the emergency that led to the damage.
得知经过后，李先生很快回复对方表示理解：“如果有需要，砸就砸吧，人命抵不过一块破碎的玻璃吗？”
图源：潇湘晨报
次日，获救者家属再次致电表达感谢，并提出承担车辆玻璃维修费用。李先生婉拒，表示维修费用由自己承担。
Upon learning what had happened, Li responded with understanding: "If there was a need, break it. A human life outweighs a broken piece of glass."
The next day, the family called again to express their gratitude and offered to pay for the repair, but Li declined, saying he would cover the cost himself.
记者了解到，近年来已有部分车主像李先生一样，自费在车内配置AED，并在车窗贴上“车内配有AED，紧急情况可破窗”的提示标识。
车主贴在车窗上的标识 受访者供图 图源：新京报
资料显示，AED是一种可被非专业人员使用的用于抢救心脏骤停患者的便携式医疗设备。在最佳抢救时间“黄金4分钟”内，利用这种设备对患者进行除颤和心肺复苏，可有效提升患者存活率。不过，围绕车载AED，社会上也出现了一些争议。有人质疑：为了取用设备擅自砸坏车窗是否合理？
社会急救专家刘钦认为，更值得关注的是，未来何时可以将这些社会力量真正纳入城市急救体系。例如，将移动AED接入120急救指挥调度系统，成为城市应急响应网络的一部分。
The incident has also sparked broader discussion about the role of privately owned AEDs in emergency response systems. While some questioned whether breaking the window was justified, first aid expert Liu Qin suggested the focus should be on how to better integrate such resources into urban emergency networks.
"Imagine if mobile AEDs could be connected to the 120 emergency dispatch system and become part of the city's emergency response infrastructure," Liu said.
“整个领域都在想办法，让AED能够在‘黄金4分钟’甚至更短时间内到达现场。”刘钦说，目前来看，最大的瓶颈仍然是设备密度和普通人对使用AED的认识。
Liu added that experts are exploring ways to ensure AEDs can reach patients within the "golden four minutes" — or even faster. "At present, the biggest bottlenecks remain device density and the public's understanding of how to use an AED," he said.
记者注意到，北京伟睿律师事务所律师林虎才曾就类似事件回应表示，当事人在无法联系车主的情况下，为抢救心梗患者砸窗取走AED，并事后短信告知车主，该行为构成紧急避险。因紧急避险造成的车窗损失及其他合理费用，应由实施避险一方对车主予以补偿。
“车主李先生的这块车窗，折射出的是社会文明的光辉”，合肥日报发表评论称，当越来越多像李先生这样的车主愿意自费配备AED，让自己的车成为一座“流动急救站”时，我们更需静下心来思考一个现实问题：如何呵护这份珍贵的善意，让它能够持续地传递下去？来源：新京报 潇湘晨报 合肥日报 中国青年报
跟着China Daily
精读英语新闻
“无痛”学英语，每天20分钟就够！
↓↓↓
推 荐 阅 读