男子嫌父母起的名字不好听，一直用化名上班，离职后要求公司赔钱被拒，法院：不是欺诈，公司赔31237元
双语君约 4 分钟A worker surnamed Wang has persuaded a court to reject an employer's challenge to his employment, in a case released by the Shandong High People's Court on Monday.
Wang joined Company A on June 15, 2024, to handle the management of fitness sales. At work, he went by the alias "Wang Jie", which also appeared in attendance records and store receipts.
On April 16, 2025, Wang said that he needed two days off and did not return. No written labor contract was signed, and no social insurance was paid during the period.
劳动人事争议仲裁委员会经审理后裁决：确认王某香自2024年7月17日至2025年5月16日与A公司存在劳动关系；A公司支付王某香未签订书面劳动合同二倍工资差额31237元；驳回王某香的其他仲裁请求。
After leaving, Wang sought arbitration, requesting confirmation of the employment and payments for double wages, economic compensation, medical costs, and weekend overtime.
The arbitration body found a relationship from July 17, 2024, to May 16, 2025, awarded 31,237 yuan in double-wage difference, and rejected his other claims.
公司：属于欺诈行为
A公司不服，主张王某香入职以来，一直使用假名字“王杰”，属于欺诈行为，致使公司在错误认识下将其招用。因此，A公司诉至法院，要求确认原被告之间不存在劳动关系；不向王某香支付未签订劳动合同二倍工资差额。
王某香辩称，仅因自己觉得父母起的名字不好听，所以对外使用化名“王杰”，并无欺诈的故意；卫生健康局出具的《卫生行政执法文书送法回执》中收件人为“王杰（王某香）”，已经交回A公司，能充分证明自己没有刻意隐瞒真实姓名，原告应当履行仲裁裁决认定的法律责任。
Company A then sued, arguing that the use of an alias amounted to fraud and had led it to hire him by mistake. Wang said he chose the alias because he disliked his given name and had no intention of deceiving Company A.
The court found that the fitness-sales management post had no special identity, qualifications, or licensing requirements. Wages were paid by WeChat transfer, allowing the company to verify his real name through real-name registration.
Wang followed attendance rules, accepted management, and provided labor throughout. The alias did not obstruct the relationship or mislead the company to hire Wang, the court said.
The judgment upheld the arbitration findings and dismissed the company's other claims.
跟着China Daily
精读英语新闻
“无痛”学英语，每天20分钟就够！
↓↓↓
推 荐 阅 读