到底是谁在“挑战送陌生女孩回家”？
双语君约 3 分钟女性安全，何时成了“互联网乐子”的素材？
Certain videos capturing female pedestrians from behind at night have gone viral on social media, exploiting others for entertainment.
不少人认为这些博主的行为并非出于“善意”，而是用娱乐化的幌子掩盖骚扰的事实，将“尾随”包装成了“护送”，利用路人女性的恐惧和公众对于女性安全的关注骗取流量，“简直是恶趣味！”
Many have criticized these creators, arguing that their actions are far from "well-intentioned" — essentially rebranding stalking as "escorting services". By exploiting women's fears and public concerns about female safety for clicks, these videos represent what netizens angrily condemn as "sheer sick entertainment".
部分博主在街头随意挑选陌生女子搭讪，并提出送对方回家，对方表示拒绝后仍穷追不舍，并口出低俗、诋毁之语。
In some videos, content creators randomly approach unfamiliar women on the street, offering to escort them home. Despite clear rejections, they persist relentlessly, even resorting to vulgar and demeaning language.
6月2日晚，@抖音黑板报回应了相关舆论：经核查，相关视频虽大多注明剧情演绎，但存在将不当行为低俗娱乐化博眼球的问题。平台已全面回扫此类主题视频，并限制流量不予推荐。
对此，有律师表示，这些视频中存在的尾随、骚扰女性和追逐等不当行为，即使注明摆拍、剧情演绎，也有不良示范效应，可能受到处罚。
律师认为，博主未经路人女性同意，将她们的肖像公开于短视频中，侵犯了女性的肖像权；博主在尾随过程中存在偷窥、偷拍、窃听、散布他人隐私等行为，属于侵犯他人隐私权行为。
Lawyers argue that by publicly posting videos of female pedestrians without their consent, these bloggers are violating individuals' portrait rights. Furthermore, their actions — including stalking, voyeurism, unauthorized recording, eavesdropping, and the dissemination of private information — constitute violations of privacy rights under the law.
我们尚不知视频中的路人女孩，本身就是拍摄团队里的成员，还是大街上随机被选中的素材，但无论哪一种，都不可取。尤其后者的行为不是低俗可以简单概括的，受到惊吓和骚扰的女性，完全可以向涉事博主主张自己的权益。
与此同时，对于这些精心揣摩算法的视频，平台方需要精准治理，让视频博主清晰地了解到底线和红线所在，引导其回归正确的道路。
推 荐 阅 读