中国日报双语新闻

买家半年“仅退款”225个快递,朋友圈内容曝光!最新解读

近日,有商家在社交媒体曝光半年来她被买家刘某利用平台漏洞,用6个账号“仅退款”225个包裹。相关消息引发关注。

A vendor has revealed that she was exploited for six months by a customer who allegedly used loopholes on an e-commerce platform to secure 225 packages through "refund-only" claims.

Image
12月7日,话题“仅退款225个快递女子打造富婆人设”冲上微博热搜。
Image
据报道,商家时女士发视频称,半年来她被一位女顾客刘某利用平台漏洞,用6个账号“仅退款”225件331单。
该女子每次会在店铺购买多样商品,商品价格从十几元到几百上千元不等。并且其在快递还未签收时,将贵价商品申请仅退款“拦截快递”,再将低价商品的面单与贵价商品交换,把低价商品当成贵价商品退回。

According to media reports, the merchant, surnamed Shi, said in a video that a customer surnamed Liu used six accounts to submit 225 "refund-only" claims across 331 orders. 

Liu allegedly purchased items priced from a few dozen yuan to over a thousand yuan, then requested refunds before delivery and swapped shipping labels to return low-cost products in place of high-value ones.

刘某还在网上打造富婆人设销售所得财物,2020年,刘某曾经发朋友圈称:“你们都在搬砖,我在搬人民币,都是一袋子一袋子给,这两天光安排人存钱了!”这些行为导致商家时女士损失5.4万余元。目前时女士已报警。

Shi said Liu resold the fraudulently obtained goods online while cultivating a wealthy persona. A 2020 social media post showed Liu boasting, "You're all moving bricks, I'm moving bags of cash — I've spent days having people deposit money!" Shi said the scheme caused her losses of more than 54,000 yuan, and she has reported the case to police.

Image

刘某在朋友圈和粉丝群炫富 图源:Hui 时小姐

事发后刘某转账求和解

时女士将事情在网上曝光后,她称收到多位商家私信“他们也遇到了同样的事”,核对地址后发现是同一个人。
时女士向媒体表示,事发后对方转账给她“求和解”,“我拒绝了,成年人应该得到应有的判罚”。

After Shi went public, several other merchants contacted her with similar complaints, and they later confirmed the buyer was the same individual. Shi added that Liu later transferred money attempting to negotiate a settlement, but she refused, saying adults should face the consequences of their actions.

Image

刘某转账欲补齐差价希望留条路 图源:Hui 时小姐

时女士展示的受案回执显示,广州市公安局增城区分局卫山派出所已受理该案。
Image

律师解读:

女子的行为已构成诈骗罪

浙江五联律师事务所律师张建齐认为,该女子的行为已构成诈骗罪,其主观上具有非法占有目的,下单时就无支付对价意愿,还通过更换快递面单等隐秘手段骗取财物,且将赃物转卖牟利,符合诈骗罪的构成要件。

同时,根据时女士视频称,刘某曾向时女士转账两次,分别为2万元和3万元希望时女士“留一条路”。
张律师认为,刘某其实际犯罪所得可能不低于2万-3万元,而诈骗罪入罪金额为3000-1万元(对应3年以下有期徒刑);若金额达3万元以上则属“数额巨大”,将面临3-10年有期徒刑。

Zhang Jianqi, a lawyer with Zhejiang Wulian Law Firm, said Liu's actions clearly constitute criminal fraud. Liu deliberately avoided paying for the goods, used deceptive tactics such as switching shipping labels, and resold the items for profit, he said. 

Zhang added that Liu's actual illegal gains may exceed 20,000–30,000 yuan, the amounts she transferred while seeking leniency. Under Chinese law, fraud involving 3,000–10,000 yuan is punishable by up to three years in prison, while cases above 30,000 yuan can carry a three- to ten-year sentence.


部分网友认为快递员或者驿站也负有责任,张律师告诉记者,快递员或驿站若无明知或串通行为,则无需为此承担责任,因该行为属于独立违法犯罪,非普通合作行为。

Addressing speculation that couriers or pickup stations might share responsibility, Zhang said they would not be liable unless they acted with knowledge or collusion.

来源:中国青年报 极目新闻 潇湘晨报 @钱江视频

跟着China Daily

精读英语新闻

“无痛”学英语,每天20分钟就够!

↓↓↓

Image

推 荐 阅 读

Image