买家半年“仅退款”225个快递,朋友圈内容曝光!最新解读
A vendor has revealed that she was exploited for six months by a customer who allegedly used loopholes on an e-commerce platform to secure 225 packages through "refund-only" claims.
According to media reports, the merchant, surnamed Shi, said in a video that a customer surnamed Liu used six accounts to submit 225 "refund-only" claims across 331 orders.
Liu allegedly purchased items priced from a few dozen yuan to over a thousand yuan, then requested refunds before delivery and swapped shipping labels to return low-cost products in place of high-value ones.
Shi said Liu resold the fraudulently obtained goods online while cultivating a wealthy persona. A 2020 social media post showed Liu boasting, "You're all moving bricks, I'm moving bags of cash — I've spent days having people deposit money!" Shi said the scheme caused her losses of more than 54,000 yuan, and she has reported the case to police.
刘某在朋友圈和粉丝群炫富 图源:Hui 时小姐
事发后刘某转账求和解
After Shi went public, several other merchants contacted her with similar complaints, and they later confirmed the buyer was the same individual. Shi added that Liu later transferred money attempting to negotiate a settlement, but she refused, saying adults should face the consequences of their actions.
刘某转账欲补齐差价希望留条路 图源:Hui 时小姐
律师解读:
女子的行为已构成诈骗罪
同时,根据时女士视频称,刘某曾向时女士转账两次,分别为2万元和3万元希望时女士“留一条路”。
Zhang Jianqi, a lawyer with Zhejiang Wulian Law Firm, said Liu's actions clearly constitute criminal fraud. Liu deliberately avoided paying for the goods, used deceptive tactics such as switching shipping labels, and resold the items for profit, he said.
Zhang added that Liu's actual illegal gains may exceed 20,000–30,000 yuan, the amounts she transferred while seeking leniency. Under Chinese law, fraud involving 3,000–10,000 yuan is punishable by up to three years in prison, while cases above 30,000 yuan can carry a three- to ten-year sentence.
部分网友认为快递员或者驿站也负有责任,张律师告诉记者,快递员或驿站若无明知或串通行为,则无需为此承担责任,因该行为属于独立违法犯罪,非普通合作行为。
Addressing speculation that couriers or pickup stations might share responsibility, Zhang said they would not be liable unless they acted with knowledge or collusion.
跟着China Daily
精读英语新闻
“无痛”学英语,每天20分钟就够!
↓↓↓
推 荐 阅 读