蒋方舟回应清华教授对其“论文造假”指控

肖鹰教授对我的硕士论文列出了23项“造假”指控。其中大量指控严重失实。这里只举若干例子说明。

对肖鹰教授的四项核心指控正面回应如下：

一、指控“抄袭”“洗稿”——不成立

所涉各条，或为公共常识性表述，或为有明确出处的引文因版本误标、转引未注造成的著录问题。

作者没有将他人的独创性表述据为己有；所有被指“抄袭”的引文，论文均已明示其为引文，且实际来源全部可查。

In a statement published on Saturday, Jiang responded to claims made by Xiao Ying, a professor at Tsinghua University, saying the alleged plagiarism involved either common expressions or properly cited quotations and that all disputed sources could be verified.

二、指控“全面造假”“凭空编造”“虚构英文引文”——不成立

从《弗兰肯斯坦》的序言与题词，到《最后一人》《马尔蒂达》的段落，再到雪莱的诗行、玛丽·雪莱的书信日记、伍尔夫的演讲——每一处英文均真实见于原著。除一处对日记与书信两处材料作了合并转述外，不存在任何编造。

Jiang also rejected claims that she fabricated English-language citations, saying all quoted passages came from original sources. 

三、指控“使用AI写作”——不成立

论文写作于2018—2019年，当时根本不存在可用于论文写作的生成式人工智能工具（ChatGPT于2022年11月方才发布）。

我未使用任何人工智能或其他技术手段辅助写作。反而是肖鹰教授在打假过程中屡屡使用人工智能，导致出现大量幻觉与谬误。

She denied using AI, noting that the thesis was completed in 2018 and 2019, before generative AI tools such as ChatGPT became available.

对这一最为严重的指控，肖鹰教授没有提供任何证据。

作者自2018年起持续研究玛丽·雪莱，撰写了相关专著文稿（公开可查的文字共计6.6万字），从不同角度对玛丽·雪莱进行研究；论文的问题意识、材料脉络与作者公开的研究和写作一脉相承。无证据的指控，不应被提出，更不应被采信。

Jiang further dismissed accusations of ghostwriting, saying no evidence had been provided.

五、指控“紧急从知网上下架”——不成立。

我的论文从未上过知网，只是在校园网站上发布，有校内账号者可以查看。所以并不存在所谓“紧急从知网下架”等行为。

She also denied claims that the thesis had been removed from CNKI, a leading online academic database, stating it had never been published there.

Jiang said she would report Xiao's alleged online harassment, defamation and privacy violations to the relevant authorities at Tsinghua University and reserved the right to take legal action.